<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FMLA law Family Medical Leave Act update, Latest cases on FMLA Law &#187; FMLA eligibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fmla-law.com/category/fmla-eligibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fmla-law.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meeting the FMLA&#8217;s eligible employee requirement</title>
		<link>http://fmla-law.com/2008/02/05/meeting-the-fmlas-eligible-employee-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://fmla-law.com/2008/02/05/meeting-the-fmlas-eligible-employee-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fmlalaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMLA cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA eligibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmla-law.com/2008/02/05/meeting-the-fmlas-eligible-employee-requirement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staunch v. Continental Airlines, Inc., &#8212;F.3d&#8212;, 2008 WL 60193 (CA 6(Ohio)), 13 Wage &#038; Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 175. Airline stewardess sued airline after being terminated alleging that employer interfered with exercise of her FMLA rights. Appeals court affirmed district court&#8217;s dismissal of her claim finding that she was not an eligible employee under FMLA as [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staunch v. Continental Airlines, Inc., &#8212;F.3d&#8212;, 2008 WL 60193 (CA 6(Ohio)), 13 Wage &#038; Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 175.</p>
<p>Airline stewardess sued airline after being terminated alleging that employer interfered with exercise of her FMLA rights.  Appeals court affirmed district court&#8217;s dismissal of her claim finding that she was not an eligible employee under FMLA as she had not worked the requisite number of hours.<br />
<span id="more-91"></span><br />
Employee must work 1,250 hours in the twelve months preceding her request for intermittent leave.  Courts look to principles for calculating hours of service established under FLSA.  Determining factor is the number of hours an employee has worked for the employer.  Any accurate accounting of actual hours worked under FLSA&#8217;s principles may be used.  If employer does not maintain an accurate record of hours worked, the employer has burden of showing that the employee has not worked the requisite hours.</p>
<p>In this case, the employer proffered an affidavit from HR Manager with an attached chart of employee&#8217;s total hours worked.  Employee attempted to counter with an affidavit and an attached undated list of tasks and hours worked based upon her recollection.  </p>
<p>Court found that employee&#8217;s undated list did not set forth specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial and then pointed to deficiencies within the list that affected employee&#8217;s credibility (despite credibility not being a factor in summary judgment motions).</p>
<p>It appears that in the end, the party with the appealing list of hours worked may ultimately win.  Employees and employers must be very specific when it comes to matters of hours worked to determine FMLA eligibility.  </p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fmla-law.com/2008/02/05/meeting-the-fmlas-eligible-employee-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family and Medical Leave Notification Form</title>
		<link>http://fmla-law.com/2007/07/18/family-and-medical-leave-notification-form/</link>
		<comments>http://fmla-law.com/2007/07/18/family-and-medical-leave-notification-form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fmlalaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA eligibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA notification form]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmla-law.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Family and Medical Leave FormCLICK HERE TO ORDER Family and Medical Leave Act Form to provide notification to employers of contemplated Family and Medical Leave. Protect your rights and ensure your ability to take Family and Medical Leave by giving proper notice to your employer of your need to go on leave. No related posts. [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://www.findlegalforms.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=26439&#038;cl=1&#038;partner=lruzicho"><img src="http://www.findlegalforms.com/xcart/image.php?productid=26439" alt="Family and Medical Leave Form" border=0></a><br /><b><a href="http://www.findlegalforms.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=26439&#038;cl=1&#038;partner=lruzicho">Family and Medical Leave Form</a></b><IMG src="http://www.findlegalforms.com/xcart/banner.php?cl=1&#038;partner=lruzicho" width=1 height=1 border=0><br /><b><a href="http://www.findlegalforms.com/xcart/customer/product.php?productid=26439&#038;cl=1&#038;partner=lruzicho">CLICK HERE TO ORDER</a></b></center></p>
<p>Family and Medical Leave Act Form to provide notification to employers of contemplated Family and Medical Leave.  Protect your rights and ensure your ability to take Family and Medical Leave by giving proper notice to your employer of your need to go on leave.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fmla-law.com/2007/07/18/family-and-medical-leave-notification-form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee can count prior employment with same employer towards 12 month requirement</title>
		<link>http://fmla-law.com/2007/02/16/employee-can-count-prior-employment-with-same-employer-towards-12-month-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://fmla-law.com/2007/02/16/employee-can-count-prior-employment-with-same-employer-towards-12-month-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fmlalaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMLA eligibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmla-law.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Rucker v. Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6 (CA 1 2006), the court of appeals for the first circuit held that the complete separation of an employee from his employer for a period of years does not prevent the employee from counting earlier periods of employment toward satisfying the 12-month requirement. In essence, an [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Rucker v. Lee Holding Co., 471 F.3d 6 (CA 1 2006), the court of appeals for the first circuit held that the complete separation of an employee from his employer for a period of years  does not prevent the employee from counting earlier periods of employment toward satisfying the 12-month requirement.  In essence, an employee that came back to work for the same employer could count his prior working tenure towards the FMLA&#8217;s 12-month eligible employee requirement.</p>
<p>
<!-- Begin Google Adsense code -->

<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3500218183012804";
/* 336x280, created 7/22/10 */
google_ad_slot = "9512868334";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<!-- End Google Adsense code -->
</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fmla-law.com/2007/02/16/employee-can-count-prior-employment-with-same-employer-towards-12-month-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
